Analyzing tactical implications
I want to summarize what the report indicates overall, especially about Inter's back three and the importance of pace and recovery. I'm considering slower center-backs and highlighting how Bisseck's speed, 1v1 skills, and aggressive stepping can be utilized in different positions. I also need to discuss the risks of inexperience and positioning. There are scenarios to consider, like facing fast opponents or playing without Pavard. Finally, I could ask if the user wants a translated summary or tactical breakdown.
要点解读：
- 意媒称：国米现有中卫（如阿切尔比、德弗里等）在大空间回追上速度一般，遇到高位失误或被直塞打身后时有隐患。
- 比塞克的优势：对抗强、回追速度更好，边侧大范围覆盖和1v1纠错能力强，能弥补高位防线被打身后的风险。 
- 最合适站位：右中卫位（替代/轮换帕瓦尔或与其错位），或在对手翼侧冲击强时出场；也可在需要压得更高、逼抢更激进的阶段使用。
- 战术收益：允许边翼卫更大胆前压；在转换防守中提供“最后一道保险”；对付快马型前锋（反击、直塞）更稳。
- 权衡与风险：比赛阅读和站位经验不如老将；在被压迫的出球稳定性略逊顶级后卫，需中场与门将参与二次出球分担。
- 现实用法：先从针对性轮换与特定对手（速度型前锋、强调反击的球队）开始，逐步增加出场时段与强强对话的试水。
需要我基于你看到的报道源做个简短翻译/摘要，还是给出对下场可能首发与换人时机的更具体建议？